22-Year-Old Suspect, Not Affiliated with Either Party, Taken into Custody as Suspect in Charlie Kirk Case

The man accused in the Charlie Kirk assassination had earlier expressed to family his opposition to the viewpoints of the conservative activist, the authorities said Friday in announcing an arrest in a targeted killing that raised fresh alarms about political violence in the United States.

Tyler Robinson, 22, had indicated to a family friend afterwards that he was responsible , said Utah Gov. Spencer Cox. He also cited as key pieces of evidence engravings on bullets found in a rifle believed used in the attack as well as chatting app messages attributed to the accused shooter that a roommate shared with law enforcement after the shooting.
Tyler James Robinson was admitted to Utah State University on a prestigious academic scholarship, according to a video of him reading his acceptance letter posted to a family member’s social media account. A university spokesperson says he attended for only one semester in 2021.

Utah state records say Robinson was registered as a voter but not affiliated with either political party.

Here’s what we know so far:

• The suspect: Officials have identified Robinson as the suspect in Kirk’s assassination. Utah Gov. Spencer Cox said he is believed to have acted alone and that the investigation is ongoing. The governor would not say if Robinson is cooperating with authorities.


• The arrest: Robinson’s arrest Thursday night was disclosed by President Trump, who said in a Fox News Channel interview that, “With a high degree of certainty, we have him.” Robinson had become “more political” in the run-up to the shooting and had indicated to a family friend afterwards that he was responsible, said Utah Gov. Spencer Cox. The suspect’s father saw surveillance photos and worked with a pastor to encourage the surrender in Kirk’s killing , according to a law enforcement official who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss an ongoing investigation.


• Security gaps: The assassination offers the latest example of how ordinary security measures can be defeated in an era of escalating political violence, when anyone associated with the political process is a potential target. Security experts interviewed by AP questioned whether the event was sufficiently staffed but also acknowledged the limitations of both campus police forces and outdoor venues.